Endoskopie 2010; 19(1): 34-36

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty

MUDr.Marek Schmidt, FEBU, MUDr.Pavel Hanek, MUDr.Štěpán Veselý, Ph.D., doc.MUDr.Ladislav Jarolím, CSc.
Urologická klinika UK 2. LF a FN Motol, Praha

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a more difficult surgery in urology and it depends upon intracorporeal suture technique handling. Better

postoperative course, less complications and soon recovery are benefits for patients. Article reffers about indication, technique and

results of first 12 laparoscopic pyeloplastics. With mean operative time 206 minutes and mean hospital stay of 6,7 days we accomplished

laparoscopic pyeloplasty in all patients without conversions and any complications. All patients are asymptomatic and we detected no

obstructive curves in postoperative dynamic scintigraphy.

Keywords: pyeloplasty, laparoscopy, hydronephrosis

Published: April 28, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schmidt M, Hanek P, Veselý Š, Jarolím L. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Endoskopie. 2010;19(1):34-36.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Kawaciuk I. Kongenitální anomálie horních močových cest, Urologie. Praha: Galen, 2009: 110-114.
    2. Frauscher F, Janetschek G, Klauser A, Peschel R, Halpern EJ, Pallwein L, Helweg G, zur Nedden D, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction with crossing vessels: contrast-enhanced color Doppler findings and long-term outcome; Urology. 2002; 59(4): 500-505. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and long-term outcome; Urol Clin North Am. 1998; 25(2): 323-330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction, Eur Urol. 2003; 44(3): 340-345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Singh P, Kapoor R, Suri A, K J Singh, Mandhani A, Dubey D, Srivastava A, Kumar A. Comparison of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for poorly functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Indian J Urol; 2007; 23(1): 9-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Frauscher F. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Urol Clin North Am. 2000; 27(4): 695-704. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Doo CK, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Long-term outcome of endopyelotomy for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: how long should patients be followed up?; J Endourol. 2007; 21(2): 158-161. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM, Chow GK, Leroy AJ, Slezak J, Patterson DE, Segura JW. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution; 2006; 20(10): 707-712. Go to original source...
    9. Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, Sugiono M, Schulze M, Teber D, Frede T. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty; J Urol. 2007; 177(3): 1000-1005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, Zelster IS, Figueroa TE, Mitchell ME. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient; J Endourol. 2004; 18(9): 875-878. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, McGinnis DE, Bagley DH. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade. J Urol. 2008; 180(4): 1397-1402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Urology. 1996; 47(3): 311-316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty; World J Urol. 2008; 26(6): 539-547. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol. 2002; 42(5): 453-457. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Braga LH, Pace K, Demaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Effect on Operative Time, Length of Hospital Stay, Postoperative Complications, and Success Rate. Eur Urol. 2009. [Epub ahead of print]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Endoscopy

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.