Endoskopie, 2010; 19(3-4): 94-95

A complex view of the options for reconstruction of urethrovesical anastomosis

MUDr.Jakub Fejfar, MUDr.Miroslav Štursa
Urologické oddělení NsP Nový Jičín

during laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Article assesses the options for reconstruction of urethrovesical anastomosis during laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical

prostatectomy. It focuses on the posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter along with periurethral suspension stitch designed to

shorter interval to recovery of continence in patients undergoing radical surgical treatment for prostate cancer.

Keywords: prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, urinary continence, suspension technique

Published: November 24, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fejfar J, Štursa M. A complex view of the options for reconstruction of urethrovesical anastomosis. Endoskopie. 2010;19(3-4):94-95.
Download citation

References

  1. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 189-202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 2003; 61: 699-702. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Poulakis V, Skriapas K, de Vries R. Vesicourethral anastomosis during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between the single-knot running and interrupted technique. Urology 68: 1284-1289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Branco AW, Kondo W, Camargo AHLA. Laparoscopic Running Urethrovesical Anastomosis with Posterior Fixation. Urology 2007; 70: 799-802. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Emiliozzi P, Martini M, d'Elia G. A New Technique for Laparoscopic Vesicourethral Anastomosis: Preliminary Report. Urology 2008; 72: 1341-1343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recover of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 996-1003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Woo JR, Shikanov S, Zorn KC. Impact of Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Retrospective Analysis of Time to Continence. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY 2009; 23: 1995-1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: Results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2008; 180: 1018-1023. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Walsh PC. Anatomical radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998; 160: 2418-2424. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ. Periurethral Suspension Stitch During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Description of the Technique and Continence Outcomes. EUR UROL 2009; 56: 472-478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Endoscopy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.